One thing that is still open after traveltech_sara’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
JessicaM_2024 said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
I read this differently from JessicaM_2024, on substance rather than tone. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
JessicaM_2024 said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemJessicaM_2024 said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.