GenomicsKate said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
GenomicsKate said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after GenomicsKate’s answer:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Dr.NateNeph said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on Dr.NateNeph here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.