🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionMuscle protein synthesis window — my results so far

Muscle protein synthesis window — my results so far

JakeBK_lifts Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:43 PM 28 replies 1,737 viewsPage 1 of 6
This thread is more than 11 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
JakeBK_lifts
Member
523
2,345
Jul 2024
Brooklyn, NY
Jul 2, 2025 at 10:43 PM#1

Read the primary source rather than the write-up and the two do not agree, so here is what is actually in it.

Distribution matters less than total but it is not nothing. Roughly 25 to 40g per sitting with enough leucine to trigger synthesis, three or four times a day, is more effective than the same total in one enormous evening meal — and on a suppressed appetite the enormous evening meal is the one you will not finish anyway.

Where I think it is weakest: the follow-up is short relative to how long people actually take these drugs, so durability is an assumption here rather than a finding.

The narrow version of the question is how people are hitting a protein target on a genuinely suppressed appetite, because volume is the binding constraint rather than willingness. Tell me what I have not thought of.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
12 7TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN, LabKate and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BethLabQueen
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
May 2024
Virginia
Online
Jul 2, 2025 at 10:48 PM#2
JakeBK_lifts said:
Distribution matters less than total but it is not nothing.

JakeBK_lifts has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie. Isolate powders, Greek yoghurt and cottage cheese, egg whites, lean fish, and tinned tuna all deliver a lot of protein in a small physical volume. Front-load it: appetite is usually least suppressed in the first hours after waking and worst on the day or two after dosing, so get the majority in early in the day and early in the week.

11 6Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LarryQC_SD
Senior Member
2,123
9,876
Jan 2024
San Diego, CA
Jul 2, 2025 at 10:53 PM#3
JakeBK_lifts said:
Distribution matters less than total but it is not nothing.

I will push back on the powder-first advice. It works and it also trains people out of eating food, and when the drug stops the habits are what remain. Getting protein from meals is slower and holds up better afterwards.

10 5TinaHashiRN, robert_kc, dan_philly and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.EndoEP
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
El Paso, TX
Jul 2, 2025 at 10:58 PM#4

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. The RDA is the wrong reference and it is worth understanding why. 0.8 g/kg is the intake at which nitrogen balance is not negative in healthy weight-stable adults — a floor for deficiency prevention, not an optimum, and derived in a population that is not in a deficit. In a substantial energy deficit, protein requirement rises because amino acids are being oxidised for energy and because muscle protein synthesis is blunted. The literature on preserving lean mass during weight loss lands around 1.4 to 2.0 g/kg of reference body weight, which is roughly two to two and a half times the RDA.

Last edited: Jul 3, 2025 at 12:58 AM
9 4Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Jul 2, 2025 at 11:25 PM#5
BethLabQueen said:
On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie.

Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.

Last edited: Jul 3, 2025 at 2:25 AM
8 3bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london, tane_welly and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1236

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register