robert_kc said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Mine went the same way, slower.
robert_kc said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after robert_kc’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
raj_cambridge said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently from raj_cambridge, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.