🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsSide Effects & ManagementPancreatitis risk assessment — March 2026 Page 2

Pancreatitis risk assessment — March 2026

sarah.morrison Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 3:33 AM 9 replies 740 viewsPage 2 of 2
amsterdam_pete
Senior Member
1,567
6,789
Feb 2024
Netherlands
Mar 6, 2026 at 10:03 AM#6
mike_nyc said:
Pancreatitis scare with pancreatitis risk: had severe upper abdominal pain radiating to my back at week 7.

Pushing back on mike_nyc here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.

40 10JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Mar 6, 2026 at 12:36 PM#7

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Last edited: Mar 6, 2026 at 4:36 PM
39 9MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LindaRN_retired
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Sarasota, FL
Mar 6, 2026 at 3:09 PM#8
amsterdam_pete said:
Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.

Last edited: Mar 6, 2026 at 6:09 PM
38 8amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa, mike_nyc and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
NicoleRaleigh
Member
356
1,567
Aug 2024
Raleigh, NC
Mar 6, 2026 at 5:42 PM#9

One thing that is still open after jason_sac26’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

37 7VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sarah.morrison
VIP Member
3,212
14,567
Jan 2024
California
Online
Mar 7, 2026 at 5:57 AM#10

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong. The measurement I was reading had moved less than its own week-to-week variation, which somebody said upthread and I did not believe.

Last edited: Mar 7, 2026 at 6:57 AM
9 7kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Nausea incidence by dose tier — STEP and SURMOUNT meta-analysis16 replies
Constipation on GLP-1: pathophysiology and fiber protocol5 replies
Alopecia on GLP-1 — telogen effluvium differential diagnosis3 replies
Gallbladder disease risk — cholelithiasis data from clinical trials12 replies
Pancreatitis risk assessment — pooled safety analysis15 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register