🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOther Peptides & Research CompoundsIpamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience? Page 7

Ipamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience?

PedsEndoPhilly Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:05 PM 46 replies 2,741 viewsPage 7 of 10
mike_mealprep
Member
412
1,890
Jul 2024
Chicago, IL
Sep 18, 2024 at 12:53 AM#31
PedsEndoPhilly said:
Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect.

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.

3 1mia_MS2, LeilaHI, marcus_mpls
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseLeah_Nash
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Nashville, TN
Sep 18, 2024 at 11:23 AM#32
PedsEndoPhilly said:
Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect.

Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.

4 2BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmD_Rodriguez
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Miami, FL
Sep 18, 2024 at 9:53 PM#33
PedsEndoPhilly said:
Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask.

5 3robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
Sep 19, 2024 at 8:24 AM#34

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.

6 4BariatricNurseD, MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
rick_sfbay
Member
289
1,234
Jan 2025
San Francisco, CA
Sep 19, 2024 at 6:55 PM#35
hyun_seoul said:
Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.

7 5Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

BPC-157 oral vs injectable — bioavailability review and evidence15 replies
TB-500 for tissue repair — mechanism and clinical evidence4 replies
Selank and Semax — anxiolytic peptides overview2 replies
CJC-1295/Ipamorelin combination — GH secretagogue discussion23 replies
BPC-157 + GLP-1 stacking for gut healing — N=1 experience17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register