🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsProgress & Lab ResultsCRP from 12.4 to 0.8 — inflammation before and after GLP-1 Page 5

CRP from 12.4 to 0.8 — inflammation before and after GLP-1

DataDave Sat, May 23, 2026 at 4:32 PM 32 replies 970 viewsPage 5 of 7
pete_nash
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Nashville, TN
May 26, 2026 at 3:39 PM#21
LipidDoc_ATL said:
The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

7 5Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BiostatsBrad
Member
456
2,345
Jul 2024
Durham, NC
May 27, 2026 at 12:25 PM#22

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

8 6Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
nancy_portland
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Portland, ME
May 28, 2026 at 9:10 AM#23

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

9 7MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
stefan_berlin
Member
234
1,123
Oct 2024
Berlin, DE
May 29, 2026 at 5:55 AM#24
BiostatsBrad said:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.

Last edited: May 29, 2026 at 8:55 AM
10 8TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FitDadDave
Member
534
2,678
Jul 2024
Minneapolis, MN
May 30, 2026 at 2:39 AM#25
BiostatsBrad said:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.

11 9jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

100 lbs lost in 14 months — comprehensive DEXA and lab data16 replies
12-month metabolic panel comparison — before and after GLP-122 replies
A1C from 9.2 to 5.4 in 8 months — my diabetes reversal journey16 replies
6-month body recomposition — DEXA, labs, progress photos22 replies
1-year semaglutide anniversary — honest review with all data16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register