Peptide stability and storage — 12 month update

NurseKim_ATL said:

Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

lisa_labSD said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Pushing back on lisa_labSD here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

lisa_labSD said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.