One thing that is still open after PeptideChemSF’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
One thing that is still open after PeptideChemSF’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
hannah_MT said:Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect.
I read this differently from hannah_MT, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
Happy to go further on any of that.
hannah_MT said:Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemhannah_MT said:Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.