paige_pharma said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
raj_cambridge said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemTrialNerd_Beth said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Carry on.