🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionHas anyone dealt with powerlifting on glp-1? Page 2

Has anyone dealt with powerlifting on glp-1?

FitDadDave Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 7:55 AM 9 replies 708 viewsPage 2 of 2
DebRD_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Mar 20, 2026 at 11:33 PM#6
PharmacoVig_BOS said:
The intervention that works is boring and well evidenced: resistance training two to three times a week at a genuine effort, protein at 1.4 to 2.0…

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I think this board over-worries about lean mass. Some lean loss is obligatory — you need less muscle to move a smaller body, and preserving mass you no longer need is not a health outcome. The question is whether strength and function held, and mine did.

10 5BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Mar 21, 2026 at 5:45 AM#7
FitDadDave said:
Two DEXA scans eleven months apart: down 24kg total, of which the scan says 6kg was lean.

DEXA scan update relevant to lean mass:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass270 lbs215 lbs197 lbs
Fat mass100 lbs70 lbs47 lbs
Lean mass153 lbs149 lbs154 lbs
Body fat %39%35%21%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.6g/kg protein. The lean mass discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

9 4maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sarah_TO
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Toronto, CA
Mar 21, 2026 at 11:57 AM#8
DebRD_ATL said:
I think this board over-worries about lean mass.

OMG yes. lean mass + resistance training is the combo. Can confirm.

Last edited: Mar 21, 2026 at 3:57 PM
8 3GraceAZ_72, carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
marco_milano
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Milan, IT
Mar 21, 2026 at 6:09 PM#9

One thing that is still open after pete_nash’s answer:

What fraction of loss being lean mass is actually normal, because the numbers quoted here range from 10% to 40% and cannot all be right?

7 2tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FitDadDave
Member
534
2,678
Jul 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Mar 22, 2026 at 11:55 PM#10

Closing the loop on my own question.

Second scan under matched conditions, six months apart, same time of day: the lean number came back nearly a kilo higher than the panic scan. Strength was up throughout.

39 12jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register