JakeSmashed95 said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
JakeSmashed95 said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
JakeSmashed95 said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from JakeSmashed95 — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently from lucas_SP_BR, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.