FDA_TrackerJim said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
I read this differently from FDA_TrackerJim, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
FDA_TrackerJim said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFDA_TrackerJim said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.