BPC-157 actually fixed my bad knee?? Is this placebo

DataDave said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.

DataDave said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.

DataDave said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

LindaRN_retired said:

Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…

Same pattern here, and in the same order.