🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsSemaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy)Semaglutide and GFR improvement — FLOW trial renal endpoints

Semaglutide and GFR improvement — FLOW trial renal endpoints

Dr.RenalNash Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 9:15 PM 15 replies 218 viewsPage 1 of 3
Dr.RenalNash
VIP Member
1,234
7,890
Mar 2024
Nashville, TN
Jun 6, 2026 at 9:15 PM#1

Posting this because the summary going around does not say what the paper says, and the difference matters for how people here are using it.

FLOW is the relevant trial and it reported a meaningful reduction in kidney-disease progression and related death in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The mechanism looks to be a mixture of reduced albuminuria, better glycaemia and blood pressure, and a probable direct anti-inflammatory effect on the glomerulus. Separately, eGFR is genuinely noisy during rapid weight loss — a small early dip is common and usually haemodynamic rather than damage.

Where I think it is weakest: the follow-up is short relative to how long people actually take these drugs, so durability is an assumption here rather than a finding.

The question I want answered is how to read eGFR during rapid weight loss, given that creatinine depends on muscle mass and muscle mass is changing. I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
23 18wei_SG, cory_ATX, lori_vegas and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NeuroNate
Senior Member
2,890
16,789
Dec 2023
Chicago, IL
Jun 6, 2026 at 9:47 PM#2
Dr.RenalNash said:
FLOW is the relevant trial and it reported a meaningful reduction in kidney-disease progression and related death in people with type 2 diabetes and…

All true, with one condition: that curve is for people who reached the dose on schedule. Anyone who slowed the ladder for tolerability is on a different, flatter curve, and comparing yourself with the published mean will make you feel like a non-responder when you are not.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

22 17wendy_avl, jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.LipidDallas
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Dallas, TX
Jun 6, 2026 at 10:19 PM#3
Dr.RenalNash said:
FLOW is the relevant trial and it reported a meaningful reduction in kidney-disease progression and related death in people with type 2 diabetes and…

I will push back on the "any working dose is fine" framing. The maintenance evidence sits overwhelmingly at the top studied dose, and the extension data shows regain tracking dose reduction rather than tracking stopping. Holding low is reasonable; pretending it is evidentially equivalent is not.

Last edited: Jun 7, 2026 at 12:19 AM
21 16cory_ATX, lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
ingrid_STO
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Stockholm, SE
Jun 6, 2026 at 10:51 PM#4

Short answer first, then the reasoning. Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak. People who dose late are not losing a peak, they are letting the trough fall, and the appetite effect tracks the trough.

20 15InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL, SaraMom3 and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DerekSJ_a1c
Member
378
1,678
Aug 2024
San Jose, CA
Jun 7, 2026 at 1:56 AM#5
NeuroNate said:
All true, with one condition: that curve is for people who reached the dose on schedule.

That holds for the injectable. The oral formulation has different absorption behaviour and the dose numbers are not interchangeable, which is worth saying out loud because people quote them as if they were.

19 14AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

STEP 1-5 trials comprehensive summary — efficacy endpoints compiled12 replies
Oral semaglutide 50mg Phase 3 — OASIS program results16 replies
Semaglutide pharmacokinetics — half-life, Tmax, steady state modeling10 replies
Compounded semaglutide stability data — temperature and light sensitivity16 replies
0.25mg → 2.4mg titration: optimal schedule based on clinical data6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register