PureRawz peptides — looking for input

DanielChem_CHI said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

DanielChem_CHI said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.

paige_pharma said:

I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.

paige_pharma said:

I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.