MariaRD said:No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
MariaRD said:No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here.
Coming at MariaRD’s question from a different direction. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from MariaRD — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Dr.AddMedPHL said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
I read this differently from Dr.AddMedPHL, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.