Retatrutide resting energy expenditure — need advice

DanielChem_CHI said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

DanielChem_CHI said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

TrialTracker_MD said:

It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.

Mine went the same way, slower.

TrialTracker_MD said:

It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.