Glucagon-mediated thermogenesis on retatrutide — need advice

LipidDoc_ATL said:

For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.

I read this differently from LipidDoc_ATL, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.

LipidDoc_ATL said:

For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.

Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.

Happy to go further on any of that.

LipidDoc_ATL said:

For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

rachel_ABQ said:

There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.