🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsRetatrutide & Triple Agonists24% weight loss number blew my mind - please be real — my results so far Page 9

24% weight loss number blew my mind - please be real — my results so far

ingrid_STO Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 4:02 AM 44 replies 2,496 viewsPage 9 of 9
stefan_berlin
Member
234
1,123
Oct 2024
Berlin, DE
Dec 1, 2024 at 9:05 AM#41

One thing that is still open after Dr.MetabolicMD’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

43 16NeuroNate, JessicaH_TX, KevinCompounds and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FDA_TrackerJim
Senior Member
1,567
7,890
Feb 2024
Rockville, MD
Dec 2, 2024 at 11:16 AM#42
SleepDoc_PDX said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Pushing back on SleepDoc_PDX here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.

44 17Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Dec 3, 2024 at 1:27 PM#43

Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part.

Last edited: Dec 3, 2024 at 5:27 PM
45 18RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
quinn_sf
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
San Francisco, CA
Dec 4, 2024 at 3:37 PM#44
SleepDoc_PDX said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

Last edited: Dec 4, 2024 at 9:37 PM
46 19andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP, GraceAZ_72 and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RenalNash
VIP Member
1,234
7,890
Mar 2024
Nashville, TN
Dec 5, 2024 at 5:47 PM#45

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

47 20maria_elpaso, anders_CPH, Dr.NutriCornell and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1789

Similar Threads

TRIUMPH-3 topline results — 24.2% body weight loss at 48 weeks10 replies
Retatrutide mechanism: GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonism explained5 replies
Retatrutide Phase 2 dose-response analysis — optimal dose range10 replies
Glucagon receptor agonism and hepatic lipid oxidation — MASH implications13 replies
Retatrutide vs tirzepatide — dual vs triple agonist comparison22 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register