Swiss Chems got an FDA warning letter — my results so far

rachel_ABQ said:

The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

Coming at rachel_ABQ’s question from a different direction. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.

Following on from rachel_ABQ — and this may be the naive question:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

DoseLogDan said:

One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

DoseLogDan said:

One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.

That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.