Retatrutide kidney outcomes — my results so far

One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

Worth separating that from renal function, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

One thing that is still open after PharmD_Rodriguez’s answer:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

PeptideSynthNJ said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

PeptideSynthNJ said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.

Worth separating that from renal function, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

PeptideSynthNJ said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.