Dr.GutHealth said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
Dr.GutHealth said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
Happy to go further on any of that.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after Dr.GutHealth’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
stefan_berlin said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.