From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Dr.PathRoch said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.PathRoch said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Coming at Dr.PathRoch’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Following on from Dr.PathRoch — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?