Dr.RaviCardio said:baseline bloodwork + this community = winning.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
Dr.RaviCardio said:baseline bloodwork + this community = winning.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
mel_PDX said:One addition: if the lab changes analytical platform between your draws, the comparison breaks and nobody tells you.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.
Dr.RaviCardio said:baseline bloodwork + this community = winning.
I read this differently from Dr.RaviCardio, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Happy to go further on any of that.