🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersVitamin B12 monitoring — what worked for you? Page 2

Vitamin B12 monitoring — what worked for you?

bri_stats Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:27 AM 9 replies 1,237 viewsPage 2 of 2
Dr.CardioMD
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Cleveland, OH
Sep 26, 2025 at 10:58 AM#6
BethLabQueen said:
Blood count monitoring for micronutrients: my doctor noticed my MCV (mean corpuscular volume) trending up at month 6: 89 → 98 fL.

Vitamin D levels and micronutrients: an often-overlooked connection. Obese individuals store vitamin D in adipose tissue, making it less bioavailable. As you lose fat, vitamin D can actually increase WITHOUT supplementation.

My trajectory: Baseline 18 ng/mL → Month 6 (with supplement) 42 ng/mL → Month 12 48 ng/mL. Target is 40-60 ng/mL. Adequate vitamin D supports immune function, bone health, and mood — all relevant during weight loss.

41 11kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
HPLC_Greg
Senior Member
1,890
8,901
Feb 2024
Research Triangle, NC
Sep 26, 2025 at 11:57 AM#7

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

Last edited: Sep 26, 2025 at 5:57 PM
40 10JenPlateau, SallyK_inj, CryptoCarl and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Sep 26, 2025 at 12:56 PM#8
Dr.CardioMD said:
Vitamin D levels and micronutrients: an often-overlooked connection.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

Last edited: Sep 26, 2025 at 4:56 PM
39 9AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
Sep 26, 2025 at 1:55 PM#9

Following on from BariatricNurseD — and this may be the naive question:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

Last edited: Sep 26, 2025 at 4:55 PM
38 8sophie_paris, mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Sep 26, 2025 at 6:41 PM#10

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Reporting back for the archive rather than for the thread: I did the narrow version of what was suggested, gave it the full interval, and it settled. Posting it because threads without a follow-up are half a thread.

50 23julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register