paige_pharma said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
DadBodDave said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
paige_pharma said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Pushing back on paige_pharma here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.