Coming back to something from earlier in the thread, because it keeps being talked past:
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
One thing that is still open after hans_munich’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Closing the loop on my own question.
Following up because I said I would. I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking. It resolved, and I cannot prove which half of that did it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDr.PathRoch said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
Dr.PathRoch said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.