A1cHero_PHX said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
A1cHero_PHX said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from A1cHero_PHX — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
SleepDoc_PDX said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Happy to go further on any of that.