DebRD_ATL said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
DebRD_ATL said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
NurseLeah_Nash said:Agreed, and hsCRP is worth reading alongside them.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
DebRD_ATL said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Careful with treating an unchanged LDL-C as a failure. If ApoB and triglycerides both fell, the particle picture improved regardless of what the calculated LDL says.
Worth separating that from the lipid panel, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.