🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareMuscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — my results so far Page 6

Muscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — my results so far

pete_nash Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 8:01 PM 55 replies 3,270 viewsPage 6 of 11
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Feb 11, 2024 at 4:01 AM#26

One thing that is still open after PharmacoVig_BOS’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

Last edited: Feb 11, 2024 at 10:01 AM
19 19HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg, bri_stats and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RaviCardio
VIP Member
2,890
15,678
Jan 2024
New York, NY
Feb 11, 2024 at 11:58 AM#27
BethLabQueen said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.

Worth separating that from lean-mass preservation, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

Last edited: Feb 11, 2024 at 12:58 PM
18 18anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo, hans_munich and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SleepRoch
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Rochester, MN
Feb 11, 2024 at 7:55 PM#28
BethLabQueen said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.

17 17Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
LindaRN_retired
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Sarasota, FL
Feb 12, 2024 at 3:52 AM#29
BethLabQueen said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.

16 16LondonLisa, mike_nyc, VendorMark and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_nash
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Nashville, TN
Feb 12, 2024 at 11:49 AM#30

Reporting back.

Follow-up: I dropped the cardio to two easy sessions and put the effort into three real lifting sessions. The scale slowed and the scan improved.

44 19sarah.morrison, NeuroNate, JessicaH_TX and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
14567811

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register