🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareMuscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — my results so far Page 3

Muscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — my results so far

pete_nash Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 8:01 PM 55 replies 3,270 viewsPage 3 of 11
mike_nyc
VIP Member
5,678
21,345
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Feb 8, 2024 at 10:12 AM#11
sophie_paris said:
The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate…

Agreed on the ranges, with the condition that a single DEXA is not a measurement, it is one draw from a distribution. Hydration status moves the lean compartment by a kilogram or more between scans, so any comparison of scans done at different times of day or different hydration states is noise.

5 5maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
alex_tucson
Member
567
2,345
May 2024
Tucson, AZ
Feb 8, 2024 at 12:48 PM#12
SallyK_inj said:
Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers.

That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

Last edited: Feb 8, 2024 at 2:48 PM
4 4labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Feb 8, 2024 at 3:24 PM#13
sophie_paris said:
The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate…

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I think this board over-worries about lean mass. Some lean loss is obligatory — you need less muscle to move a smaller body, and preserving mass you no longer need is not a health outcome. The question is whether strength and function held, and mine did.

Worth separating that from lean-mass preservation, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

Last edited: Feb 8, 2024 at 5:24 PM
3 3DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Feb 8, 2024 at 6:00 PM#14

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.

2 2ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Feb 8, 2024 at 8:36 PM#15

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Carry on.

1 1PeptideSynthNJ
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register