Dr.RenalNash said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.RenalNash said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from Dr.RenalNash — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Reporting back.
Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.