JennaRN said:Update: I got the sleep and the intake sorted before deciding it was the drug, and most of the flatness went with them.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
JennaRN said:Update: I got the sleep and the intake sorted before deciding it was the drug, and most of the flatness went with them.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
JennaRN said:Update: I got the sleep and the intake sorted before deciding it was the drug, and most of the flatness went with them.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Worth separating that from mood and mental health, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
wendy_avl said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.