Dr.PeteFamMed said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.
VendorMark said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
VendorMark said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Coming at VendorMark’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.