🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersLipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers Page 2

Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers

LipidDoc_ATL Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 3:47 AM 19 replies 468 viewsPage 2 of 4
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Jun 8, 2026 at 4:10 AM#6
sarah.morrison said:
A defensible baseline is short: HbA1c and fasting glucose, a lipid panel with ApoB if you can get it, ALT and AST, creatinine with eGFR, TSH, ferritin…

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I would drop the "get everything" instinct further than this thread does. Every extra test is another chance at a false positive, and incidental findings have their own cost in scans, biopsies and worry.

6 9Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA, CarlaRPh_TPA and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lucas_SP_BR
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
São Paulo, BR
Jun 8, 2026 at 4:20 AM#7
LipidDoc_ATL said:
I got a full panel before starting and a repeat at three months, and the second one is more useful than the first purely because I now have something…

Shot day Thursday report relevant to baseline bloodwork:

Week 16. Currently on 0.5mg. Down 32 lbs from starting weight of 244 lbs.

This week's observations: Energy levels excellent, zero nausea.

Labs due next week — looking forward to seeing the metabolic panel. I'll post results in the Lab Results section when they come in.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 6:20 AM
7 10Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jun 8, 2026 at 4:29 AM#8
TrialTracker_MD said:
I would drop the "get everything" instinct further than this thread does.

Coming at TrialTracker_MD’s question from a different direction. ApoB is the more informative number and it is cheap. LDL-C estimates cholesterol mass in atherogenic particles; ApoB counts the particles, and it is particle count that tracks risk — which is why the two can disagree and why the disagreement is the clinically interesting case. Triglycerides fall substantially with weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity, HDL moves modestly, and LDL-C often barely moves at all, which surprises people who expected everything to improve together.

8 11ingrid_STO, pete_nash, hank_denver and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
carl_compliance
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Raleigh, NC
Jun 8, 2026 at 4:38 AM#9

One thing that is still open after mike_mealprep’s answer:

What actually belongs on a baseline panel, as opposed to the enormous list that gets pasted around here?

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 7:38 AM
9 12FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92 and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LipidDoc_ATL
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jun 8, 2026 at 5:23 AM#10

Closing the loop on my own question.

Took the whole panel in rather than the one flagged line, and the conversation lasted two minutes instead of generating three more tests.

33 8KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
Kidney function on semaglutide — eGFR and UACR improvements21 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register