🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsInternationalSwitzerland BAG coverage — anyone have experience? Page 6

Switzerland BAG coverage — anyone have experience?

hank_denver Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:40 AM 47 replies 3,019 viewsPage 6 of 10
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Aug 18, 2024 at 5:44 PM#26

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

17 17RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DoseLogDan
Member
201
567
Feb 2025
Montana
Aug 22, 2024 at 4:21 AM#27
bri_stats said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

16 16Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO, mia_MS2 and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NicoleRaleigh
Member
356
1,567
Aug 2024
Raleigh, NC
Aug 25, 2024 at 3:00 PM#28
bri_stats said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

Last edited: Aug 25, 2024 at 4:00 PM
15 15COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.CardioMD
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Cleveland, OH
Aug 29, 2024 at 1:41 AM#29
bri_stats said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

14 14roxy_nash, tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Sep 1, 2024 at 12:24 PM#30

Reporting back.

Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer. Nothing about my case changed; only who was doing the talking.

Last edited: Sep 1, 2024 at 4:24 PM
42 17Dr.DermMIA, fiona_VT, denise_HTX and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
14567810

Similar Threads

EU EMA compounding guidance — 2026 regulatory update9 replies
UK NHS GLP-1 prescribing — NICE TA875 and access guide7 replies
Australian TGA scheduling changes — peptide access 20268 replies
Canadian GLP-1 coverage — provincial formulary comparison6 replies
Purchasing GLP-1 in Mexico — legality, quality, and safety concerns6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register