🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsClinical Trials & ResearchPemvidutide Phase 2 — NAFLD endpoints Page 3

Pemvidutide Phase 2 — NAFLD endpoints

MASHdoc_SA Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 4:01 AM 20 replies 520 viewsPage 3 of 4
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Jun 6, 2026 at 1:06 PM#11
Dr.RenalNash said:
Read four things before the headline number.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.

Last edited: Jun 6, 2026 at 4:06 PM
11 11sean_dublin, hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
claudia_zurich
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Zurich, CH
Jun 6, 2026 at 5:08 PM#12

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Bayesian meta-analysis perspective on the trial evidence: traditional frequentist meta-analyses report point estimates and confidence intervals. Bayesian approaches provide probability distributions that are more intuitive for clinical decision-making.

For example: "There is a 98.5% probability that semaglutide 2.4mg produces >10% weight loss vs placebo" is more actionable than "RR 3.4, 95% CI 2.8-4.1, p<0.001."

The the trial evidence evidence is strong under both frameworks, but Bayesian analysis better communicates the degree of certainty for individual patient counseling.

10 10tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jun 6, 2026 at 9:10 PM#13
LindaRN_retired said:
The liver data is among the strongest non-weight findings in the class.
LindaRN_retired said:
...regarding the trial evidence...

I think this is an underappreciated point. To expand on it with some data:

A recent meta-analysis of 18 RCTs (n=15,600) found that the trial evidence was associated with a robust effect size across diverse patient populations[1].

The NNT was 15, which is comparable to metformin for T2DM prevention. That's a strong clinical argument for this approach.

Last edited: Jun 7, 2026 at 2:10 AM
9 9ingrid_STO, pete_nash, hank_denver and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.PathRoch
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Jun 7, 2026 at 1:12 AM#14
MASHdoc_SA said:
Relative and absolute effects need reading together.

Propensity score matching studies and the trial evidence: when RCTs aren't available for a specific question, propensity score-matched observational studies can provide useful evidence.

A recent PSM study of 12,000 GLP-1 users vs matched controls showed reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.81) over 3 years of follow-up[1].

These results complement the RCT data and suggest the benefits translate to real-world populations.

References:
[1] Registry-based cohort study, pre-print 2024.
8 8SaraMom3, Dr.MetabolicMD, RetaRick_CA and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jun 7, 2026 at 5:14 AM#15

Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

7 7PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

FLOW trial: semaglutide renal outcomes — NEJM publication review14 replies
SELECT trial: semaglutide 2.4mg cardiovascular outcomes — 4yr data9 replies
TRIUMPH program (retatrutide) — Phase 3 trial design and endpoints13 replies
Orforglipron ATTAIN trials — oral non-peptide GLP-1 agonist8 replies
CagriSema (amylin + semaglutide) — REDEFINE Phase 3 results20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register