Dr.PeteFamMed said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Dr.PeteFamMed said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Dr.PeteFamMed said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Taking it to my next appointment.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Dr.BariatricHTX said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.