🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCompounding & FormulationUSP <797> 2023 revision impact on peptide compounding — July 2024 Page 7

USP <797> 2023 revision impact on peptide compounding — July 2024

sean_dublin Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 12:23 PM 37 replies 1,520 viewsPage 7 of 8
MounjBrad
Member
278
890
Oct 2024
Kentucky
Oct 27, 2025 at 1:17 AM#31
NicoleRaleigh said:
Compounding pharmacy licensing verification for compounded supply: before ordering, verify your pharmacy's credentials: State Board of Pharmacy…

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

23 21patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA, fiona_VT and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LipidDoc_ATL
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Atlanta, GA
Nov 1, 2025 at 6:49 PM#32

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

24 22traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Nov 7, 2025 at 12:24 PM#33
LipidDoc_ATL said:
Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.

Second this.

25 23patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA, fiona_VT and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
HealthEcon_DC
Member
567
3,456
Apr 2024
Washington, DC
Nov 13, 2025 at 6:03 AM#34
LipidDoc_ATL said:
Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

26 24TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TirzTom
Senior Member
2,789
9,876
Feb 2024
Florida
Online
Nov 18, 2025 at 11:45 PM#35

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

27 0DeniseRN_TPA, SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

503A vs 503B compounding — regulatory framework explained4 replies
Compounded semaglutide stability: accelerated degradation study results6 replies
Lyophilized vs liquid peptides — stability and bioavailability comparison18 replies
Bacteriostatic water sourcing and sterility considerations8 replies
State-by-state compounding pharmacy regulations — 2026 map8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register