🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareThe "Ozempic face" phenomenon — 6 month update Page 5

The "Ozempic face" phenomenon — 6 month update

JakeBK_lifts Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 3:48 AM 21 replies 1,506 viewsPage 5 of 5
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Jul 7, 2025 at 5:41 AM#21
Dr.EndoEP said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Coming at Dr.EndoEP’s question from a different direction. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.

Happy to go further on any of that.

11 9fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Jul 8, 2025 at 12:03 PM#22

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

12 10NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs, B12Beth and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SandraNC_45
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Charlotte, NC
Jul 9, 2025 at 6:26 PM#23

One thing that is still open after Dr.EndoEP’s answer:

How much of the between-person variation is pharmacokinetic and how much is just adherence measured badly?

13 11NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
AmyNC_wife
Member
634
2,890
Jun 2024
North Carolina
Jul 11, 2025 at 12:50 AM#24
Dr.NateNeph said:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

I read this differently from Dr.NateNeph, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.

Last edited: Jul 11, 2025 at 1:50 AM
14 12Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
laura_annarbor
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Ann Arbor, MI
Jul 12, 2025 at 7:15 AM#25
Dr.NateNeph said:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

No disagreement with Dr.NateNeph. One condition attached. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.

15 13JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1345

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register