Nov 12, 2025 at 7:22 PM#6
Contract lab perspective on tirz vs sema stability testing:
We've run stability studies on dozens of compounded formulations of both peptides. General trends:
Semaglutide formulations:
- Most well-formulated versions maintain >95% potency at 90 days refrigerated
- Degradation is primarily deamidation and oxidation products
- Relatively forgiving of minor pH and temperature excursions
- Most preservative systems are compatible
Tirzepatide formulations:
- More variable results — potency at 90 days refrigerated ranges from 85-97% depending on formulation
- Higher rates of aggregation, especially above 10mg/mL concentration
- More sensitive to pH — optimal range is approximately pH 5.5-6.5 (narrower than sema)
- Some preservative interactions noted (benzyl alcohol at standard concentrations can accelerate degradation in certain tirz formulations)
- Polysorbate 20 inclusion significantly improves stability and reduces adsorption
Key takeaway: A compounder who produces excellent semaglutide may not automatically produce excellent tirzepatide. The formulation expertise matters, and compounders should have SEPARATE validation data for each product.
I'd rank the importance of getting a CoA for compounded tirz even higher than for sema. The molecule is less forgiving of formulation errors.
22 17Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report