Dr.EndoIndy said:VendorMark said: ...regarding the trial evidence...
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
GenomicsKate said:Bayesian meta-analysis perspective on the trial evidence: traditional frequentist meta-analyses report point estimates and confidence intervals.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Dr.EndoIndy said:VendorMark said: ...regarding the trial evidence...
I read this differently from Dr.EndoIndy, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.