PedsEndoPhilly said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Nothing to add that would improve it.
PedsEndoPhilly said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Nothing to add that would improve it.
PedsEndoPhilly said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Closing the loop on my own question.
Late follow-up. I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.