Mar 28, 2024 at 10:30 AM#26
One thing that is still open after Dr.NutriCornell’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
11 11TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 29, 2024 at 2:05 AM#27
HPLC_Greg said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Last edited: Mar 29, 2024 at 6:05 AM
10 10MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 29, 2024 at 5:40 PM#28
HPLC_Greg said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
9 9oliver_london, tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsMar 30, 2024 at 9:16 AM#29
HPLC_Greg said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
8 8KetoKyle, CanadaChris, ZaraB_AL and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 31, 2024 at 12:52 AM#30
Reporting back.
Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
Last edited: Mar 31, 2024 at 2:52 AM
36 11JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report