One thing that is still open after NurseAsh_DET’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
denise_HTX said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
denise_HTX said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemdenise_HTX said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.