JessicaM_2024 said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
JessicaM_2024 said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
JessicaM_2024 said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from JessicaM_2024 — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
labquiet_amy said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.