The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
One thing that is still open after GenomicsKate’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
stefan_berlin said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsReporting back.
Late follow-up. I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
DebRD_ATL said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.