lisa_labSD said:Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
lisa_labSD said:Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer.
Coming at lisa_labSD’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after lisa_labSD’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
lucas_SP_BR said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Pushing back on lucas_SP_BR here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.