Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:PedsEndoPhilly said: ...regarding the trial evidence...
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Following on from pete_manc_UK — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Dr.PulmRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.PulmRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.